The Force is omnipresent, binding the universe and everything and everyone in it together. The Force is largely represented as nurturing and benign in nature, but it has a dark side as well.
This is really rather strange considering that some of the characters, namely Aegisthus, do not even have dialogue and never once appear on stage. They do what they must because fate as lead them to act.
Euripides adds a few little touches to the myth that add depth to the well-known characters. For example, Clytemnestra plainly admits to having had an affair only because her husband was unfaithful first.
She blames him for her disgrace and deems that it is unjust for men not to be criticized for their affairs. She makes some pretty good points in this version of the story prior to the knowledge that she is going to die.
I found myself more readily sympathizing with her. It was an odd experience for me because I had been so firmly attached to my perception of her as a stupid bitch. And yet here she was coming to purify her daughter after the birth of her grandchild and making some very accurate statements about patriarchal culture.
I was almost touched. That is probably my favorite thing about this version as a whole. Euripides provides amble opportunity for the characters to really have it out with one another.
Even those who are seemingly together on an issue. This to me shows a difference in how the playwrights were trying to portray Electra. At the palace the audience might not be as sympathetic towards her while at the cottage they might be more inclined to be on her side because of her situation.
Why did Euripides decide to have Orestes himself break the news and why did Sophocles decide to have a friend of Orestes bring the news?
I can't stop when I get like this. I'm hysterical and I'm wet! I'm in pain, and I'm wet! Like the play the Producers Sophocles makes frequent use of humor as well as irony. And by what law?
Take care, or in issuing this decree You issue yourself remorse and death for if a killer merits death you must die next to satisfy that justice Take care, you offer lies for pretext. I disagree with the assertion in the intro that dramatic impact is more important then ethical significance to Sophocles.
He deals with ethics in a diffrent way then Euripdes but without a sense of ethics the irony is lost. Sophocles tells us that ethics do not exist in a void.
Sophocles makes sure we take certain the grains of truth vengeance can be self destructive. This is the case with the varying accounts of the return of Orestes by Aeschylus, Sophocles, and Euripides.
One would assume that the mere presence of three varying versions of the event would discredit the validity of the story. After all, true historical facts would not be so controversial. However, I believe that one must accept the consistencies between the stories as trivial effects of the varying interpretations.
One can see how the accounts differ when examining how Electra comes to believe that Orestes has returned. Her suspicion is confirmed when Orestes shows her an article of clothing he was given as a child.They are supreme mythic events in the life of the hero.
Admittedly this is not an ideal arrangement, as myths found in one section might be applicable to another as well.
The story of the Buddha and the Tree is a myth of withdrawal and meditation, but it is also a quest myth and in some ways a descent myth. Oedipus Rex. the actual moral status of the afflicted individual was irrelevant.
-German Philologiest (classicist) and Philosopher (). Wilamowitz-Moellendorff. Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd. Flag for inappropriate content. Guardar. Gilgamesh: a Hero's Journey Essay; Gilgamesh: a Hero's Journey Essay.
Words Mar 21st, 7 Pages. Oedipus Rex and the Hero's Journey The Layout of Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey in The Epic of Gilgamesh and The Odyssey Words | 2 Pages. Poetry – Poetry has a long history, dating back to the Sumerian Epic of Gilgamesh.
Early poems evolved from folk songs such as the Chinese Shijing, or from a need to retell oral epics, as with the Sanskrit Vedas, Zoroastrian Gathas, and the Homeric epics, the Iliad and the Odyssey. Similarities between Oedipus and Gilgamesh: Essay. The great epics “The Iliad” and “The Odyssey” and “Gilgamesh” present us with characters whose lives are in many ways radically different from our own, and yet they also describe for us the kind of personal challenge that is as familiar to us in the modern world as it was to.